Environment Protection and Fire Risk Reduction in History

Ancient civilizations had a complex relationship with fire and wildfires

Fire has always played an important role in antiquity, both in practice and in worship. For examle, the sacred fire of Vesta in ancient Rome was an eternal fire guarded by the Vestals, priestesses who took care of its maintenance and other rites.

The extinction of the fire was considered a serious event, symbolizing the loss of divine protection over the city. The practice, started with the second king of Rome (Numa Pompilio) and ended in the late fourth century.

Rare depiction of Vesta in human form. Fresco in a bakery at Pompeii, 1st century- By Mario Enzo Migliori – facebook.com, Public Domain, Wikipedia

A completely different approach, in the territory of present-day North America, has been used by Native Americans. According the National Park Service, “For many millennia, fire was integral to many Indigenous peoples’ way of life. Native Americans, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians used fire to clear areas for crops and travel, to manage the land for specific species of both plants and animals, to hunt game, and for many other important uses. Fire was a tool that promoted ecological diversity and reduced the risk of catastrophic wildfires“.

The complex relationship between Ancient Civilizations and Fire Risk

Ancient civilizations had a complex relationship with fire and wildfires. On the one hand, fire was essential for survival, used for cooking, heating, lighting, and defense. On the other hand, wildfires were a constant danger, capable of destroying homes, crops, and even entire cities. Some aspects of the relationship between ancient civilizations and fire risk include:

  • Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Fire Management. As discussed above, indigenous communities around the world developed deep traditional ecological knowledge, passed down from generation to generation, that included an understanding of the role of fire in ecosystems and techniques for managing it safely and effectively. This knowledge manifested itself in practices such as the use of controlled fire to reduce the accumulation of dead vegetation, the creation of firebreaks, and the selection of fire-resistant plant species.
  • Impact of Fire on Culture and Religion. Fire was not only a practical tool, but also had deep cultural and religious significance. In many cultures, fire was associated with purification, rebirth, and divine power. For example, Egyptian mythology told the story of the phoenix, a bird that burned itself in a pyre and was then reborn from its ashes.
  • Changes in the Use of Fire. The arrival of European settlers in North America led to a significant change in the use of fire. While indigenous peoples used fire in a controlled manner to manage their land, settlers saw fires as a threat to be eliminated. This change led to a decrease in the frequency of fires, resulting in the accumulation of dry vegetation and an increase in the risk of larger, more destructive fires.
  • Importance of Prevention and Preparedness. in “Wildland Fire: Cultural Interpretations of Fire and Human Use” the authors emphasize the importance of prevention, early detection, and effective response to safeguard cultural and natural heritage from fires. This includes creating fire risk management plans, training staff, and engaging local communities.

The relationship between ancient civilizations and fire risk was complex and multifaceted. While fire was a vital resource, it also posed a significant hazard. Traditional ecological knowledge and fire management practices played a crucial role in mitigating risks. However, changes in fire use, such as those that occurred with the arrival of European settlers, had a significant impact on the environment and increased fire risk. Lessons from the past remind us of the importance of adopting a holistic approach to fire risk management, one that takes into account traditional knowledge, the needs of local communities, and the need for adequate planning and preparation.

Prescribed fire in ponderosa pine forest in eastern Washington, United States, to restore ecosystem health – Wikipedia

The Role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Reducing Fire Risk

Traditional ecological knowledge plays a critical role in reducing fire risk at cultural and natural heritage sites. Local communities and indigenous peoples have extensive knowledge of the land, environment, vegetation, wildlife, weather patterns and hazards, passed down from generation to generation.

This knowledge can be integrated into fire risk management plans to make them more effective and sustainable in the long term. Here are some examples of how traditional ecological knowledge contributes to fire risk reduction:

  • Use of controlled fire. For millennia, indigenous communities have used fire in a controlled way to manage ecosystems and reduce fire risk. This practice, known as “cultural fires” or “prescribed fires”, reduces the accumulation of dry vegetation that can fuel fires.
  • Creating firebreaks. Traditional knowledge includes methods for creating natural and artificial firebreaks to slow or limit the spread of fires. These may include the use of streams, lakes, rocks, or other non-combustible natural features.
  • Selecting fire-resistant vegetation. Traditional landscaping practices include selecting more fire-resistant plant species, reducing the vulnerability of ecosystems to fires.
  • Vegetation management. Local communities often use traditional practices such as clearing undergrowth and selective harvesting of wood to reduce the amount of combustible material available for fires.
  • Early warning systems. Traditional knowledge of environmental cues, such as animal behavior and plant signs, can provide early warning systems for impending hazards, including fires.
  • Water management. Traditional water management practices, such as building cisterns and collecting rainwater, can provide additional water sources to fight fires.

Integrating traditional ecological knowledge into fire risk management plans offers several benefits:

  • Increased effectiveness: Plans based on local knowledge are better suited to respond to specific needs and risks in the area.
  • Long-term sustainability: Traditional solutions are often more environmentally sustainable and less costly to implement.
  • Community participation: Involving local communities in planning and implementation increases awareness and accountability.

It is important that managers of cultural and natural heritage sites work with local communities and indigenous peoples to integrate their traditional ecological knowledge into fire risk management plans. This holistic approach helps protect not only material assets, but also traditions and cultural practices related to the environment.